Clot-ED.com  
 Professionals
  Ask the Expert
  Calendar
  Case Studies
  Clinical TidBITs
  CLOT BYTES
  Corporate Corner
  Focus Articles
  History & Trivia
  Hot Topics
  Lab Pointers
  Lectures
  Links
  Terminology
  The Clotting Times
  Newsletters
 
HONcode accreditation seal. We comply with the HONcode standard for health trustworthy information:
verify here.

 

 

 

 

 
Case Studies

Case Study #2: DVT and Argatroban
 
To view Powerpoint presentation click here.
 
A 77-year-old woman was admitted to the hospital with deep vein thrombosis (DVT). The patient had recently been diagnosed with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) and as a result was now treated with argatroban anticoagulation instead of heparin. In order to ascertain the cause of the patient’s thrombophilia, the following laboratory tests were performed. Before concluding that the cause of this patient’s thrombophilia is a lupus anticoagulant (prolonging PT, APTT and mixing studies, and likewise interfering with Factor VIII, functional Protein S, and Activated Protein C Resistance assays) what other consideration could explain these findings?
 
Argatroban acts as an anticoagulant by inhibiting thrombin (Factor IIa), therefore it can affect virtually any clot-based assay, including the PT, APTT, Activated Clotting Time (ACT), and thrombin time. Because argatroban is a direct thrombin inhibitor, it acts like an inhibitor in clotting-time assays. For example, the PT and APTT remain prolonged in mixing studies. With PT- or APTT-based factor assays, argatroban produces falsely low values at lower dilutions, and values increase toward normal in the higher dilutions (ie. an inhibitor pattern). Protein C and Protein S PT- or APTT-based assays can be profoundly affected. Chromogenic assays (chromogenic Protein C) that do not involve Factor IIa are not affected. In Antithrombin III chromogenic assays that are Factor IIa-based, the Antithrombin III level is overestimated in the presence of argatroban. In the present case study, the observed Antithrombin III level is likely to be an overestimate of the true value by about 10-20%. Lupus anticoagulant assays can be false-positive in the presence of argatroban. In the present case, the screening assay (Dilute Phospholipid APTT [PTT-LA]) is false-positive, because argatroban prolongs the clotting time and acts like an inhibitor in the PTT-LA mixing study. The confirmatory assay (Hexagonal Phospholipid [Staclot-LA]) is false-positive because argatroban prolonged the clotting time so substantially that after addition of phospholipid, the resulting APTT shortened by 10.9 seconds presumably due to increased variability of the assay in this high range. In contrast to the above noted effects on clot-based assays, argatroban does not affect the reptilase time (clot-based) or DNA-based assays. Presumably it would not affect immunoassays or homocysteine assays.
 
A laboratory test that may help confirm your suspicion that a specimen contains argatroban is the Thrombin Time, which is typically substantially prolonged when therapeutic argatroban levels are present. This is particularly useful if the presence of heparin has been excluded, for example, with the use of heparinase (removes heparin if present).
 
The points raised in this Case Study also apply to specimens containing hirudin, another thrombin inhibitor that is used as an anticoagulant in HIT-positive patients. In summary, it is important to keep in mind that these two new anticoagulants can interfere with clot-based assays, potentially leading to misdiagnoses from misinterpretation of coagulation test results.
 
Submitted by Elizabeth Van Cott, MD, Director, Coagulation Laboratory, Massachusetts General Hospital
 
E-mail: evancott@partners.org
 
 
Update | Legal & Terms of Use | Privacy | Home
© 2003-2006 CLOT-ED, Inc. All rights reserved. Updated 09/2008